This paper analyzes the results of laparoscopic operations for various abdominal pathologies.

The purpose of the study is to analyze the results of treatment of emergency pathology of the abdominal organs by the endovideosurgical method.

1365 inpatient medical records were examined, which included 1396 laparoscopic surgical interventions. The following surgeries were performed: resection of the small and large intestine, viscerolysis, appendectomies, cholecystectomy (including the drainage of the common bile duct), the formation of biliodigestive anastomoses, the suturing of perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers, fundoplication, operations on pancreas, gynecological interventions. Laparoscopic surgery can been performed by a patient of any age with virtually any abdominal pathology.

1. Chung RS., Diaz JJ., Chari V. Efficacy of routine laparoscopy for the acute abdomen // Surgical Endoscopy. – 1998. – Vol. 12. – P. 219–222.

2. Cuschieri A. Cost efficacy of laparoscopic vs open surgery // Surgical Endoscopy. – 1998. – Vol. 12. – P. 1197–1198.

3. Elliott S., Savill P., Eckersall S. Cardiovascular changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a study using transoesophageal Doppler monitoring // European journal of anaesthesiology. – 1998. – Vol. 15. – P. 50–55.

4. Heinzelmann M., Schob O., Gianom D., et al. Role of laparoscopy in the management of acute appendicitis // Zetralblatt fur chirurgie. – 1999. – Vol. 124 (12). – P. 1130–1136.

5. Liu YY., Yeh CN., Lee HL., et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease in patients with severe cardiovascular disease // World journal of surgery. – 2009. – Vol. 33. – P. 1720–1726.

6. McAnena O. J., Austin O., O’Connell P. R., et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective evaluation // British Journal of Surgery. – 1992. – Vol. 79. – P. 818–820.

7. Wei H. B., Huang J. L., Zheng Z. H., et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison // Surgical Endoscopy. – 2010. – Vol. 24. – P. 266–269.