RESULTS OF USING ADJUVANT SYSTEMIC AND INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY IN PT1-4N1-3M0 GASTRIC CANCER TREATMENT
https://doi.org/10.51922/2074-5044.2023.4.79
Abstract
Introduction. The currently used standard of radically treating locally advanced gastric cancer (lGC) employs a combination of radical surgery and adjuvant polychemotherapy (APCT) that cannot prevent metachronous peritoneal dissemination (MPD), especially when treating infiltrative lGC. Therefore, it needs to be supplemented by intraperitoneal chemotherapy (ICT).
Objectives. Evaluating survival rates and cumulative incidence of рТ1-4N1-3M0 lGC after administering normothermic ICT and systemic capecitabine/oxaliplatin APCT.
Materials and methods. Long-term results of radical surgery performed on 341 lGC patients (pT1-4N1-3M0, type III-IV on the R. Borrmann scale) were analyzed. The adjuvant treatment comprised cisplatin-based normothermic ICT and capecitabine/oxaliplatin APCT. Long-term treatment results were analyzed by means of the Kaplan-Meyer multiplier estimation method, competing risks analysis to evaluate cumulative incidence (CI) of progression including that of MPD. The Fine-Gray model was used to assess the effect of ICT and APCT on the risks of tumor progression (MPD, distant lymphohematogenous metastases (RLHM) and their combinations).
Results. The application of normothermic ICT and APCT resulted in the decrease (1) in the 3-year CI of tumor progression in comparison to surgical treatment alone (59.7±3.1%), scoring after each of these procedures 48.3±9.6% and 37±6.9%, respectively, (рGray = 0.001); (2) in the 3-year MPD CI (in an isolated variant) in comparison to surgical treatment alone – (32.0±3.0%) – 17.2±7.2% и 7.7±3.8% (рGray < 0.001). Both normothermic ICT and APCT reduce the risk of developing MPD (in an isolated variant) in comparison to surgical treatment – HR 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.12–0.80), р = 0.016and HR 0.17 (95% confidence interval 0.06–0.47), р < 0.001, without effecting RLHM and combined MPD+RLGM development risks (р > 0.05).
Conclusion. The possibility of preventing MPD after administering systemic APCT and normothermic ICT highlights the importance of accounting the extent of drug therapy in evaluating the probability of MPD development after lGC radical surgery.
About the Authors
A. V. IvanovBelarus
M. Yu. Reutovich
Belarus
O. V. Krasko
Belarus
References
1. Algoritmy diagnostiki i lecheniya bol‘nykh zlokachestvennymi novoobrazovaniyami / Yu.I. Averkin [i dr.] ; pod red. O.G. Sukonko, S.A. Krasnogo // Prikaz M-va zdravookhraneniya Resp. Belarus’ № 258 ot 11 marta 2012 g. – Minsk, 2012. – C. 508.
2. Algoritmy diagnostiki i lecheniya zlokachestvennykh novoobrazovanii: klinicheskii protokol : utv. Postanovleniem M-va zdravookhraneniya Resp. Belarus‘ № 60 ot 06.07.2018 g / pod red. O. G. Sukonko, S. A. Krasnogo // Minsk : Professional’nye izdaniya, 2019. – C. 616.
3. Revtovich M. Yu. Intraoperatsionnaya otsenka veroyatnosti razvitiya metakhronnoi peritoneal’noi disseminatsii pri radikal’nom khirurgicheskom lechenii raka zheludka / M. Yu. Revtovich // Evraziiskii onkolog. zhurn. – 2019. – T. 7, № 1. – S. 18–29.
4. Revtovich M.Yu. Otsenka statusa metilirovaniya gena RECK pri prognozirovanii metakhronnoi peritoneal’noi disseminatsii u patsientov s rezektabel’nym rakom zheludka // Evraziiskii onkolog. zhurn. – 2021. – T. 9, № 1. – S. 40–48.
5. Agnes A., Biondi A., Laurino A., Strippoli A., Ricci R., Pozzo C., Persiani R., D‘Ugo D. A detailed analysis of the recurrence timing and pattern after curative surgery in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery for gastric cancer // J. Surg. Oncol. – 2020. – Vol. 122, № 2. – P. 293–305.
6. Al-Batran S.E., Homann N., Pauligk C. et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial / Salah-Eddin Al-Batran [et al.] // Lancet. – 2019. – Vol. 393, № 10184. – P. 1948–1957.
7. Aoyama T., Yoshikawa T., Hayashi T., Kuwabara H., Mikayama Y., Ogata T., Cho H., Tsuburaya A. Risk factors for peritoneal recurrence in stage II/III gastric cancer patients who received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy // Ann. Surg. Oncol. – 2012. – Vol. 19, № 5. – P. 1568–1574.
8. Bang Y.J., Kim Y.W., Yang H.K. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomized controlled trial / Yung-Jue Bang [et al.] // Lancet. – 2012. – Vol. 379, № 9813. – P. 315–321.
9. Caspers I.A., Sikorska K., Slagter A.E. et al. Risk factors for metachronous isolated peritoneal metastasis after preoperative chemotherapy and potentially curative gastric cancer resection: results from the CRITICS trial // Cancers. – 2021. – Vol. 13, № 18. – № art. 4626.
10. Fine J.P., Gray R.J. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk // J. of the Amer. Stat. Assoc. – 1999. – Vol. 94, № 446. – Р. 496–509.
11. Götze T.O., Piso P., Lorenzen S., Bankstahl U.S. et al. Preventive HIPEC in combination with perioperative FLOT versus FLOT alone for resectable diffuse type gastric and gastroesophageal junction type II/III adenocarcinoma – the phase III «PREVENT» – (FLOT9) trial of the AIO /CAOGI /ACO / T. O. Götze [et al.] // BMC Cancer. – 2021. – Vol. 21, № 1. – P. 1158.
12. Gray B. Subdistribution analysis of competing risks. R package version 2.2-7 [Electronic resource] / B. Gray. – 2023. – Mode of access: http:// CRAN.R-project.org/package=cmprsk. – Date of access: 11.05.2023.
13. Huang J.Y., Xu Y.Y., Sun Z., Zhu Z., Song Y.X., Guo P.T., You Y., Xu H.M. Comparison different methods of intraoperative and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis // Asian Pacific J. of Cancer Prevent. – 2012. – Vol. 13, № 9. – P. 4379–4385.
14. Ilhan E, Alemdar A, Ureyen O, Bas K. The Importance of Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage as a Promising Method in Patients with Gastric Cancer Showing Positive Peritoneal Cytology Without Overt Peritoneal Metastasis and Other Therapeutic Approaches // J. Invest. Surg. 2017. – Vol. 30, № 5. – P. 318-324. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2016.1247930
15. Japanese gastric cancer association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma // Gastric Cancer. – 2011. – Vol. 14, № 2. – P. 101–112.
16. Ji Z.H., Zhang Y., Li Y. Intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer: a narrative review // J. of Gastrointestinal Oncology. – 2021. – Vol. 12, suppl. 1. – P. S70–S78.
17. Koh J.L, Yan T.D., Glenn D. et al. Evaluation of preoperative computed tomography in estimating peritoneal cancer index in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis // Ann. Surg. Oncol. – 2009. – Vol. 16. – P. 327–333.
18. Kuk D. Model selection in competing risks regression / D. Kuk, R. Varadhan // Stat. Med. – 2013. – Vol. 32, № 18. – P. 3077–3088.
19. Lee J.H., Chang K.K., Yoon C., Tang L.H., Strong V.E., Yoon S.S. Lauren Histologic Type Is the Most Important Factor Associated With Pattern of Recurrence Following Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma // Ann. Surg. – 2018. – Vol. 267, № 1. – P. 105–113.
20. R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org/. – Date of access: 14.06.2023.
21. Reutovich M.Y. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in prevention of gastric cancer metachronous peritoneal metastases: a systematic review [Electronic resourse] / M.Y. Reutovich, O.V. Krasko, O.G. Sukonko // J. Gastroinest. Oncol. – 2021. – Vol. 12 (Suppl. 1). – S.5–S.17 – Mode of access: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-20-129 – Date of access: 19.04.2021.
22. Seyfried F., von Rahden B.H., Miras A.D., Gasser M., Maeder U., Kunzmann V., Germer C.T., Pelz J., Kerscher A.G. Incidence, time course and independent risk factors for metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin-a longitudinal experience from a prospectively collected database of 1108 patients / F. Seyfried [et al.] // BMC Cancer. – 2015. – Vol. 15. – P. 73.
23. Yarema R., Оhorchak М., Hyrya P., Kovalchuk Y., Safiyan V., Oliynyk Y., Rilinh O., Matusyak M. Predictive nomogram of the risk of peritoneal relapse following radical gastric cancer surgery // Proc. Shevchenko Sci. Soc. Med. Sci. – 2022. – Vol. 69, № 2. – P. 18–28.
Review
For citations:
Ivanov A.V., Reutovich M.Yu., Krasko O.V. RESULTS OF USING ADJUVANT SYSTEMIC AND INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY IN PT1-4N1-3M0 GASTRIC CANCER TREATMENT. Military Medicine. 2023;(4):79-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/2074-5044.2023.4.79
JATS XML