Paraprotesis infection: choosing the method of repeated arterial reconstruction
Abstract
The study included 31 patients with infection of a synthetic prosthesis after arterial reconstructions in the pathology of the aorto-femoral segment. 9 patients (29%) after removal of the infected prosthesis, revascularization was performed by means of a non-anatomic shunting using synthetic material and 21 (67.7%) restoration of blood flow in the lower extremities was performed using donor arterial grafts. In one case (3.2%), the infected prosthesis was not removed. In the main group, using donor arteries, a positive result of 66.7% was achieved. The results allow us to conclude that the use of biological materials (donor arterial allografts) for repeated reconstructive interventions under conditions of a purulent-septic process is more effective and allows improving the results of treatment of this category of patients.
About the Authors
A. V. RomanovichBelarus
D. V. Turlyuk
Belarus
A. G. Pischulenok
Belarus
G. S. Kikoin
Belarus
I. M. Ladutko
Belarus
V. Y. Khryshchanovich
Belarus
References
1. Chung, J., Clagett G. Neoaortoiliac system (NAIS) procedure for the treatment of the infected aortic graft // Semin. Vasc. Surg. – 2011. – Vol. 24. – P. 220–226.
2. Clagett, G., Valentine R., Hagino R. Autogenous aortoiliac/femoral reconstruction from superficial femoropopliteal veins: feasibility and durability // J. Vasc. Surg. – 1997. – Vol. 25. – P. 255–270.
3. Davies, A., Parums D. Storage of donor long saphenous vein // J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). – 1992. – vol. 33. – P. 92–107.
4. DeBakey, M. Creech O. Occlusive disease of the aorta and its treatment by resection and homograft replacement // Annals of Surgery. – 1954. – Vol. 140. – P. 290–310.
5. Jausseran, J. et al. Total prosthetic graft excision and extra-anatomic bypass // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. – 1997. – Vol. 14. – P. 59–65.
6. Kieffer, E., Gomes D., Chiche L. et al. Allograft replacement for infrarenal aortic graft infection: early and late results in 179 patients // J. Vasc. Surg. – 2004. – Vol. 39 (5). – P. 1009–1017.
7. Legout, L., Sarraz-Bournet B., D’Elia P. et al. Characteristics and prognosis in patients with prosthetic vascular graft infection: a prospective observational cohort study // Clin. Microbiol. Infect. – 2012. – Vol. 18. – P. 352–358.
8. O’Connor, S., Andrew P., Batt M. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for aortic graft infection // J. Vasc. Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 44. – P. 38–45.
9. Shahmansouri, N., et al. Characterization of the toughness and elastic properties of fresh and cryop reserved arteries // J. of Biomech. – 2015. – Vol. 48 (10). – P. 2205–2209.
10. Zhou, W., Lin P., Bush R. et al. In Situ Reconstruction with Cryopreserved Arterial Allografts for Management of Mycotic Aneurysms or Aortic Prosthetic Graft Infections: a Multi-Institutional Experience // Texas Heart Institution Journal. – 2006. – Vol. 33. – P. 14–18.
Review
For citations:
Romanovich A.V., Turlyuk D.V., Pischulenok A.G., Kikoin G.S., Ladutko I.M., Khryshchanovich V.Y. Paraprotesis infection: choosing the method of repeated arterial reconstruction. Military Medicine. 2017;(3):58-63. (In Russ.)
JATS XML