DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT ISSUES PERFORATIVE GASTRODUODENAL ULCER
https://doi.org/10.51922/2074-5044.2024.4.55
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers based on materials from the surgical departments of the «GK BSMP» healthcare institution in 2022-2023.
Material and methods. An analysis of the tactics and results of surgical treatment of 121 patients with this pathology was carried out. Of these: 82 men (67.8 %), 39 women (32.2 %) aged from 20 to 96 years. Upon admission to the clinic, patients underwent a plain radiography of the abdominal cavity. According to indications – esophagogastroduodenoscopy, repeated survey radiography of the abdominal cavity, computed tomography, laparoscopy. In the duodenum, the pathological process was localized in 104 patients (85.9 %), in the stomach – in 14 (11.6 %), in three (2.5 %) – in the area of gastroenteroanastomosis.
Results and its discussion. In the absence of a history of ulcers, the small size of the ulcer, its soft edges, symptoms of local peritonitis, and the absence of severe concomitant pathology, suturing of the perforation hole using the laparoscopic method was performed in 53 patients (43.8 %). Laparotomy and suturing of a perforated ulcer were performed in 21 patients (17.4 %); laparotomy, excision of ulcer according to Judd – 21 (17.4 %); laparotomy, excision of ulcer, transverse duodenoplasty – 17 patients (14.0 %). Excision of the perforated ulcer, extraduodenization, and transverse duodenoplasty were performed in 4 (3.3 %). When the process is located in the stomach, laparotomy, excision of the ulcer, and gastroplasty were performed in 4 cases (3.3 %), in 1 (0.8 %) – gastric resection according to Billroth-1, in 1 (0.8 %) – according to Billroth-1. 2 in the Hofmeister-Finsterer modification. 18 patients died (14.9 %). After laparotomy and suturing of the perforation – 12 (9.9 %). The most common direct cause of death was multiple organ failure syndrome – 13 (10.8 %).
Conclusion. The most frequently performed operation for perforated gastroduodenal ulcer in our clinic is currently laparoscopic suturing of the perforated hole – 53 (43.8 %). Patients experience a smooth course of the early postoperative period and no mortality.
About the Authors
G. A. SolomonovaRussian Federation
S. I. Tretyak
Russian Federation
A. V. Nezhikova
Russian Federation
V. P. Maslov
Russian Federation
References
1. Krylov N. N., Vinnichuk D. A. Perforated ulcer: pathomorphosis, collisions and trends / N. N. Krylov, D. A. Vinnichuk // Doctor. – 2012;1:15-20.
2. Nikitin V. N., Sitnikova V. M., Vyaltsin A. S., Ganenkov M. V., Kokosh A. I. Excision or suturing of a perforated duodenal ulcer? RMJ. Medical Review. 2020;4(2):78-82
3. Sovtsov S. A. Choice of treatment method for perforated gastroduodenal ulcer / S. A. Sovtsov // Surgery. – 2015;11;41-45.
4. Solomonova, G. A. Diagnosis and treatment of bleeding penetrating duodenal ulcer / G. A. Solomonova, N. V. Zavada. – Minsk, BelMAPO, 2015. – 202 P.
5. Biloslavo A., Mastronardi M., Sandano M., Gabrieli A., Troian M. Laparoscopic treat-ment for perforated gastroduodenal ulcer: direct repair surgical technique. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2023;8:22.
6. Bergström M., Vázquez J. A., Park P. O. Self-expandable metal stents as a new treatment option for perforated duodenal ulcer. Endoscopy. 2013;45(3):222-225.
7. Bonin E. A., Moran E., Gostout C. J., McConico A. L., Zielinski M., Bingener J. Natural orifi ce transluminal endoscopic surgery for patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1534-1538.
8. Buck D. L., Vester-Andersen M., Moller M. H. Prompt Surgery Is Critical for Survival in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1045-1049.
9. Chaudhary A., Bose S. M., Gupta N. M., Wig J. D, Khanna S.K. Giant Perforations of Duode-nal Ulcer. Ind J Gastroenterol. 1991;10:14-15.
10. Chung K. T., Shelat V. G. Perforated peptic ulcer – an update. World J Gastrointest Surg 2017;9:1-12.
11. Pansa A., Kurihara H., Memon M. A. Updates in laparoscopic surgery for perforated pep-tic ulcer disease: state of the art and future perspectives. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2020;5:5.
12. Liu L., Chiu P. W., Lam P. K., et al. Eff ect of local injection of mesenchymal stem cells on healing of sutured gastric perforation in an experimental model. Br J Surg. 2015;102(2):158-168.
13. Søreide K., Thorsen K., Søreide J.A. Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgeryfor perforated peptic ulcer. BJS. 2014;101:51-64.
14. Søreide K., Thorsen K., Harrison E. M., Bingener J., Møller M. H., Ohene-Yeboah M., Søreide JA. Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1288-1298.
15. Tarasconi A., Coccolini F., Biffl W. L., et al. Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 2020;15:3.
Review
For citations:
Solomonova G.A., Tretyak S.I., Nezhikova A.V., Maslov V.P. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT ISSUES PERFORATIVE GASTRODUODENAL ULCER. Military Medicine. 2024;(4):55-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/2074-5044.2024.4.55
JATS XML