Preview

Военная медицина

Расширенный поиск

Острый панкреатит билиарной этиологии. Сообщение 2. Современные принципы диагностики и лечения

https://doi.org/10.51922/2074-5044.2023.3.87

Аннотация

Представлены принципы диагностики и лечения, основанные на международных доказательных практических рекомендациях.

Особенности патогенеза заболевания диктуют необходимость выделения острого панкреатита билиарной этиологии в отдельную клиническую категорию и определяют существенные различия в тактике его лечения относительно острого панкреатита иной этиологии. Ключевыми компонентами комплексного лечения острого панкреатита билиарной этиологии являются купирование (консервативное или оперативное) протоковой гипертензии и холецистэктомия, предпочтительно – лапароскопическая, при этом период времени, когда декомпрессия протоковой системы может предотвратить прогрессирование острого панкретита, не превышает 48 ч после начала заболевания. Патогенетически обоснованным методом выбора окончательного лечения острого панкреатита билиарной этиологии является ранняя лапароскопическая холецистэктомия. Лапароскопическая холецистэктомия должна выполняться в период текущей госпитализации независимо от тяжести заболевания всем больным, как только их состояние позволит перенести вмешательство.

Об авторе

А. В. Мазаник
Государственное учреждение «432 ордена Красной Звезды главный военный клинический медицинский центр Вооруженных Сил Республики Беларусь»
Беларусь

Минск



Список литературы

1. Диагностика и лечение пациентов (взрослое население) с острым панкреатитом при оказании медицинской помощи в стационарных условиях (клинический протокол, утвержден постановлением Министерства здравоохранения Республики Беларусь от 01.06.2017 г. № 46) [электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://minzdrav.gov.by/dadvfiles/001077_605253_46ost_h.pdf. – Дата доступа: 31.03.2022.

2. Паскарь, С.В. Патогенетические подходы в лечении билиарного панкреатита / С.В. Паскарь // Вестн. Рос. Воен.-мед. акад. – 2010. – Т. 3, № 31. – С. 78–83.

3. Современные подходы к комплексному лечению билиарного панкреонекроза / М.Д. Дибиров [и др.] // НМП. – 2014. – Т. 1. – С. 17–19.

4. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis / S. Tenner [et al.] // Am. J. Gastroenterol. – 2013. – Vol. 108. – P. 1400–1415.

5. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on initial management of acute pancreatitis / S.D. Crockett [et al.] // Gastroenterol. – 2018 – Vol. 154. – P. 1096–101.

6. Clinico-biochemical prediction of biliary cause of acute pancreatitis in the era of endoscopic ultrasonography / C.L. Liu [et al.] // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. – 2005. – Vol. 22. – P. 423–31.

7. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: When should we perform MRCP and ERCP? / F. Cavdar [et al.] // Pancreatology. – 2014. – Vol. 14, № 5. – P. 411–417.

8. Diagnostic criteria in predicting a biliary origin of acute pancreatitis in the era of endoscopic ultrasound: multicenter prospective evaluation of 213 patients / P. Lévy [et al.] // Pancreatology. – 2005. – Vol. 5, №№ 4–5. – P. 450–6.

9. Early cholecystectomy safely decreases hospital stay in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: a randomized prospective study / A. Aboulian [et al.] // Ann. Surg. – 2010. – Vol. 251, № 4. – P. 615–9.

10. Early Ductal Decompression Versus Conservative Management for Gallstone Pancreatitis With Ampullary Obstruction A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial / J.M. Acosta [et al.] // Ann. Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 243, № 1. – P. 33–40.

11. Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study / H.C. van Santvoort [et al.] // Ann. Surg. – 2009. – Vol. 250, № 1. – P. 68–75.

12. Early endoscopic ultrasonography in acute biliary pancreatitis: A prospective pilot study / A. Anderloni [et al.] // World J. Gastroenterol. – 2015. – Vol. 21, № 36. – P. 10427–10434.

13. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces hospital stay in mild gallstone pancreatitis. A randomized controlled trial / F. Riquelme [et al.] // HPB (Oxford). – 2020. – Vol. 22, № 1. – P. 26–33.

14. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy are reasonable alternatives to index cholecystectomy in severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) / P. Sanjay [et al.] // Surg. Endosc. – 2008. – Vol. 22, № 8. – P. 1832–7.

15. Evaluation of Prognostic Factors of Severity in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis / P. Silva-Vaz [et al.] // Int. J. Mol. Sci. – 2020. – Vol. 21, № 12. – P. 4300.

16. Gallstone Pancreatitis: A Review / D. Cucher [et al.] // Surg. Clin. N. Am. – 2014. – Vol. 94. – P. 257–280.

17. Gallstone Pancreatitis: Admission versus Normal Cholecystectomy – a Randomized Trial (Gallstone PANC Trial) / K.M. Mueck [et al.] // Ann. Surg. – 2019. – Vol. 270, № 3. – P. 519–527.

18. Gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis / Y. Kimura [et al.] // J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. – 2010. – Vol. 17. – P. 60–69.

19. Gurusamy, K S. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis / K.S. Gurusamy, M. Nagendran, B.R. Davidson // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. – 2013 – Vol. 2, № 9. – P. CD010326.

20. Hu, C. Treatment strategy for gallstone pancreatitis and the timing of cholecystectomy / C. Hu, S-Q. Shen, Z-B. Chen // World J. Meta-Anal. – 2014. – Vol. 2, № 2. – P. 42–48.

21. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis / Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines // Pancreatology. – 2013. – Vol. 13. – P. 1–15.

22. Index versus delayed cholecystectomy in mild gallstone pancreatitis: results of a randomized controlled trial / R. Noel [et al.] // HPB. – 2018. – Vol. 20, № 10. – P. 932–938.

23. Kaiser, A.M. Repetitive short-term obstructions of the common bile-pancreatic duct induce severe acute pancreatitis in the opossum / A.M. Kaiser, A.K. Saluja, M.L. Steer // Dig. Dis. Sci. – 1999. – Vol. 44, № 8. – P. 1653–1661.

24. Kao, L.S. Evidence-Based Management of Gallstone Pancreatitis / L.S. Kao, J.S. McCauley // Adv. Surg. – 2020 – Vol. 54. – P. 173–189.

25. Kwong, W.T-Y. Unrecognized necrosis at same admission cholecystectomy for pancreatitis increases organ failure and infected necrosis / W.T-Y. Kwong, S.S. Vege // Pancreatology. – 2017. – Vol. 17, № 1. – P. 41–44.

26. Lerch, M.M. Gallstone-related pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis / M.M. Lerch, A.A. Aghdassi // Pancreapedia [Internet]. – 2016. – Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/panc.2016.24.

27. Management Guidelines for Gallstone Pancreatitis. Are the Targets Achievable? / P. Sanjay [et al.] // JOP. – 2009. – Vol. 10, № 1. – P. 43–47.

28. Management of patients after recovering from acute severe biliary pancreatitis / G. Dedemadi [et al.] // World J. Gastroenterol. – 2016. – Vol. 22, № 34. – P. 7708–7717.

29. Nealon, W.H. Appropriate Timing of Cholecystectomy in Patients Who Present With Moderate to Severe Gallstone-Associated Acute Pancreatitis With Peripancreatic Fluid Collections / W.H. Nealon, J. Bawduniak, E.M. Walser // Ann. Surg. – 2004. – Vol. 239, № 6. – P. 741–751.

30. Outcomes of early versus delayed cholecystectomy in patients with mild to moderate acute biliary pancreatitis: A randomized prospective study / S.L. Jee [et al.] // Asian J. Surg. – 2018. – Vol. 41, № 1. – P. 47–54.

31. Petrov, M.S. Early use of ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis with (out) jaundice: an unjaundiced view / M.S. Petrov // JOP. – 2009. – Vol. 10, № 1. – P. 1–7.

32. Predicting a ‚difficult cholecystectomy‘ after mild gallstone pancreatitis / D.W. da Costa [et al.] // HPB (Oxford). – 2019. – Vol. 21, № 7. – P. 827–833.

33. Prediction of common bile duct stones in the earliest stages of acute biliary pancreatitis / H.C. van Santvoort [et al.] // Endoscopy. – 2011. – Vol. 43, № 1. – P. 8–13.

34. Prevalence of Persistent Common Bile Duct Stones in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Remains Stable Within the First Week of Symptoms / M.E. Fratantoni [et al.] // J. Gastrointest. Surg. – 2021. – Vol. 25, № 12. – P. 3178–3187.

35. Qayed, E. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Decreases All-Cause and Pancreatitis Readmissions in Patients With Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis Who Do Not Undergo Cholecystectomy: A Nationwide 5-Year Analysis. / E. Qayed, R. Shah, Y.K. Haddad // Pancreas. – 2018. – Vol. 47, № 4. – P. 425–435.

36. Same-admission versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis / Y-X. Lyu [et al.] // BMC Surg. – 2018. – Vol. 18. – P. 111.

37. Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicenter randomised controlled trial / D.W. da Costa [et al.] // Lancet. – 2015. – Vol. 386, № 10000. – P. 1261–1268.

38. Shayan, H. The role of intraoperative cholangiogram in the management of patients recovering from acute biliary pancreatitis / H. Shayan, D. Kopac, C.B. Sample // Surg. Endosc. – 2007. – Vol. 21, № 9. – P. 549–52.

39. Sinha, R. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute biliary pancreatitis: the optimal choice? / R. Sinha // HPB (Oxford). – 2008. – Vol. 10, № 5. – P. 332–335.

40. The impact of timing of cholecystectomy following gallstone pancreatitis / M. Johnstone [et al.] // Surgeon. – 2014. – Vol. 12, № 3. – P. 134–40.

41. The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis / F-p. Zhong [et al.] // Medicine. – 2019. – Vol. 98. – P. 40 (e17429).

42. The Role of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Severe and/or Necrotic Pancreatitis in the Setting of Modern Minimally Invasive Management of Pancreatic Necrosis. Pancreas / T.G. Ackermann [et al.] // Pancreas. – 2020. – Vol. 49, № 7. – P. 935–940.

43. The safety, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis: A meta-analysis. / X. Yuan [et al.] // Surgeon. – 2021. – Vol. 19, № 5. – P. 287–296.

44. Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a nationwide inpatient cohort study / S. Kabaria [et al.] // Ann. Gastroenterol. – 2021. – Vol. 34, № 4. – P. 575–581.

45. Tse, F. Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis. (Review) / F. Tse, Y. Yuan // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. – 2012. – Vol. 5. – CD009779.

46. UK guidlines for the management of acute pancreatitis / UK Working Party on Acute Pancreatitis // Gut. – 2005. – Vol. 54, Suppl III. – P. iii1–9.

47. Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not superior to early ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis with biliary obstruction without cholangitis / H.S. Lee [et al.] // PLoS One. – 2018. – Vol. 13, № 2. – e0190835.

48. Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment in predicted severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (APEC): a multicentre randomised controlled trial / N.J. Schepers [et al.] // Lancet. – 2020. – Vol. 396. – P. 167–176.

49. Walayat, S. Early vs late cholecystectomy in mild gall stone pancreatitis: An updated meta-analysis and review of literature / S. Walayat, M. Baig, S.R. Puli // World J Clin Cases. – 2021. – Vol. 9, № 13. – P. 3038–3047.

50. Wilson, C.T. Cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis: early vs delayed approach / C.T. Wilson, M.A. de Moya // Scand. J. Surg. – 2010. – Vol. 99, № 2. – P. 81–5.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Мазаник А.В. Острый панкреатит билиарной этиологии. Сообщение 2. Современные принципы диагностики и лечения. Военная медицина. 2023;(3):87-94. https://doi.org/10.51922/2074-5044.2023.3.87

For citation:


Mazanik A.V. Acute pancreatitis of biliary etiology. Report 2. Current principles of diagnosis and treatment. Military Medicine. 2023;(3):87-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/2074-5044.2023.3.87

Просмотров: 167

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-5044 (Print)